Hypothetical situation: a player commits a reckless challenge. I call him over to show him a card but before I can do so he squares up to an opponent (not enough to warrant VC, but enough to be carded for AA)
My question is: Would you show a straight red with an explanation or would you show the two yellows one after another to explain whilst explaining your decision?
Apologies if this has already been covered
My question is: Would you show a straight red with an explanation or would you show the two yellows one after another to explain whilst explaining your decision?
Apologies if this has already been covered