You're right about the intent of the law change. However, now the Law is there, officials need to manage / penalise this offence, regardless of the attacking player's actions. Generally, this shouldn't be difficult or controversial ... when you see an attacker standing 'close' to a wall (of 3 or more) just instruct him to move away. Job doneYou are “right” but... the law is designed to stop argy bargy around free kicks. If the players are just getting on with it, surely smart refereeing is to get on with it.
If the attacking player has committed an offence against a player, like holding or pushing, then you’d hope VAR would get it...
but penalise not being a yard from the wall when the ref hasn’t given specific instructions...? Can’t see VAR acting on that even in an international tournament.
And a yellow card. Why not? The law is there to be enforced. Let's not set precedence for another law in the book that is never enforced. Obviously when there is a clear gap then law has served it's purpose and no action is required but when the attacker impacts the wall's ability to defend, you have to take action. Not too different to when a defender in a wall runs in early and blocks the free kick 5 meters away from the spot. Its a yellow card and a retake.There looks to be space between the player and the wall. Sure, maybe it's only 80cm instead of a meter, but are you really suggesting to give an IDFK here?
An interesting question would be what do you do if they stay a meter away but as the ball is being kicked (immediately after the whistle) they move in and nudge a defender in the wall in a way restricting the defender's movement.
Let's not set precedence for another law in the book that is never enforced.
Hmm, us? It'll be the top levels that do that.
You were counting @PinnerPaul ? (Norwich were awful at this too)Just a quick example from yesterday - WBA goalkeeper took 22 seconds to release the ball from hands at one stage!