"as we were attacking" . . . City . . . Conspiracy theory . . . ?No added time at half time at city despite a var check from the first goal. Blew up bang on 45 as we were attacking. Wtf is the point
is it not a relavent point to raise? if you;re not adding on time for a VAR review how can refs be trusted to add on time for blatent time wasting"as we were attacking" . . . City . . . Conspiracy theory . . . ?
The point is relevant . . . but the "We" and the "were attacking" belong on a fans' forum, not here.is it not a relavent point to raise? if you;re not adding on time for a VAR review how can refs be trusted to add on time for blatent time wasting
The point is relevant . . . but the "We" and the "were attacking" belong on a fans' forum, not here.
The problem is that it comes across like some users are losing their objectivity when it comes to their own teams, so it's no longer a refereeing debate.
i'd happily say the same if it was liverpool / united etc. not adding time on from a VAR review is a joke, not doing so is a deriliction of duty...discussThe problem is that it comes across like some users are losing their objectivity when it comes to their own teams, so it's no longer a refereeing debate.
all well and good but doesnt answer why time that should be added isntMoney and TV. Broadcasters hate added time as it messes their schedules up, and referees at that level become almost conditioned to play as little as possible, especially when the scores are level. I’ve been 4th official on several televised games and the floor manager wants to know how much will be added well before the 45 or 90 minutes is up. That’s why the commentator always knows how much is being added before the board goes up. Comes down to what gets said a lot on here, at those levels you aren’t just refereeing a game, you are managing an event.
That's just the TV company pushing their luck. Everyone knows there IS added time and 3/4 minutes notice on a live event is plenty of notice for the production team etc.Money and TV. Broadcasters hate added time as it messes their schedules up, and referees at that level become almost conditioned to play as little as possible, especially when the scores are level. I’ve been 4th official on several televised games and the floor manager wants to know how much will be added well before the 45 or 90 minutes is up. That’s why the commentator always knows how much is being added before the board goes up. Comes down to what gets said a lot on here, at those levels you aren’t just refereeing a game, you are managing an event.
I don't doubt it, what I meant was that when users start saying 'we' it's more difficult to judge what they're saying objectively.i'd happily say the same if it was liverpool / united etc. not adding time on from a VAR review is a joke, not doing so is a deriliction of duty...discuss
I don't doubt it, what I meant was that when users start saying 'we' it's more difficult to judge what they're saying objectively.
And yes, it aggravates me when time isn't added on for all kinds of reasons - particularly when referees have identified time-wasting during added time itself. I'm not sure it's a dereliction of duty though, more that it's one of those elements of custom and practice (like others in this thread) that unfortunately seems to be embedded.
all well and good but doesnt answer why time that should be added isnt
Not a good enough reason not to play added time when added time is required. Not like it's not expected.Because they put the officials under pressure not to. Just the same as if there are any delays before the game they are all over you trying to get it sorted. One of the games I did had ex-pros playing and one of them couldn't get his wedding ring off. The floor manager was right in my ear saying just let him play, I wasn't having it and yes it did result in a live TV game having a delayed kick off. There was no way I was letting that player out of the changing room with that ring on, but the TV crew were having a near melt down at me. You are put under immense pressure on televised games.
Because they put the officials under pressure not to. Just the same as if there are any delays before the game they are all over you trying to get it sorted. One of the games I did had ex-pros playing and one of them couldn't get his wedding ring off. The floor manager was right in my ear saying just let him play, I wasn't having it and yes it did result in a live TV game having a delayed kick off. There was no way I was letting that player out of the changing room with that ring on, but the TV crew were having a near melt down at me. You are put under immense pressure on televised games.
Not a good enough reason not to play added time when added time is required. Not like it's not expected.
I don't buy it. TV won't care about 1 minute of added time where it is required. It's not like they can't plan for it.I think in short, as brutal as this may sound, at top level, tv call the shots
not the referee
ideally, they work in tandem
but if one has to give an inch, the ref has to give in, everytime
I don't buy it. TV won't care about 1 minute of added time where it is required. It's not like they can't plan for it.
What if there's a 5 min delay for an injury? We're only playing 2 lads, itv need the TV slot for emmerdale after
As per, I struggle to waffle and keep things sweet so can only type it in black and white and hope it does not offend
unless you havd done dozens of live games, you dont need to buy it, you just need accept thats exactly how it is
After you have done 30, 40 live sky games, you can report back and see if its been sold to you,