If he’s the best of the best then I fear for the rest of you! Wow, how that list has diminished!
The FA and UEFA obviously disagree, as the latter's independent observers have him as England's top referee and he will almost certainly go to the Euros as England's sole representative.
I am very interested by the suggestion that VAR as a subconscious fallback is reducing refereeing quality, though I realise that cannot be proven. That would, however, create a self-fulfilling prophecy, which then fuels a spiral of technological meliorism. A sad state of affairs for a game where referees in early 2000s largely did well in an authentic atmosphere.
As for the decision itself, it seemed one for which implicit goalkeeper privileges swayed logic. Indeed, the failure to reverse the disallowed Watford goal also spoke to that possibility.
The inconsistency of VAR's application is still troubling. Is there an official time limit, and why, for example, can a free kick not be taken away if there was a clear offside in the build-up?
I don't think refereeing has really got worse since VAR was intervened. It's just down to perception. I'm sure that some decisions have been affected slightly by VAR being in place but it's not as if referees never missed obvious penalties etc. previously
VAR couldn't be used for the offside for the free-kick because it wasn't one of the four aspects VAR is used for. That is consistent rather than inconsistent. I think there'd be a lot more inconsistency if VAR could intervene on 'everything'.
It's definitely that. There have been articles written about his "nail art" recently.Nail varnish in the colours of the Belgian flag by the look of it.
.....he’s not that sort of player.....How unusual to see Son being a spiteful git again