ladbroke8745
RefChat Addict
So 5 minutes in this additional 15 with no hydration break but just 4 minutes in the 45 with hydration break and 4 separate sub breaks of 7 players.
IncompetenceSo 5 minutes in this additional 15 with no hydration break but just 4 minutes in the 45 with hydration break and 4 separate sub breaks of 7 players.
Flash score has said the sameI turned it off as I have no desire to watch the presentation, but live reporting says Paredes did get a red?
Given how it’s gone this far, you could’ve been spot on.Oh I'll take it back then
The directors spent enough time showing replays in game but not the ref showing a card
I don’t think we’re perpetuating them, but the way events were playing out seemed set to just fulfil the conspiracists narrative.Too many fan posts and conspiracies here. The current is too strong to swim against. I'll pick a different hill to die on.
Just seen this... (missed last half hour due to driving home from work)..
This is why I actually dont like this new law/rule.
Messi trying to get player sent off for touching his lips. No "prolonged" cover, not even a full cover of mouth...
Surely this is a match thread not specifically about refereeing. Yes refereeing will be the primary talk but its a global event that as football fans we would want to talk about.Too many fan posts and conspiracies here. The current is too strong to swim against. I'll pick a different hill to die on.
Because is isn't a clear & obvious error. I don't think it was a foul, but he gave it on pitch and the attacker definitely trod on the defender's foot so it can't be a C&O error.Why is VAR not interested? Don't see any foul in there and Vincic blew after the ball went in the goal.
Simply rewards cheatingBecause is isn't a clear & obvious error. I don't think it was a foul, but he gave it on pitch and the attacker definitely trod on the defender's foot so it can't be a C&O error.