Based on the evidence so far, sure. But what caused an investigation to open up last time? That article refers to a handball decision that didn't actually hit a hand in the previous match - if that was enough to spark an investigation in the previous incident, then I agree that FIFA are due to be hoisted by their own petard and do at least own SA an initial investigation based on these decisions.
Absolutely, but surely you could have said that about the Senegal appeal in 2018 until the investigation happened and evidence came to light as a result of that investigation? I don't know where the line should be drawn, but there is a direct precedent for at least a slightly deeper look into this.
One thing you could potentially lead to "dodgy" is that back then it was Senegal who made the complaint and got the match replayed, and in this case the referee was from Senegal - revenge maybe??
Was there more than one angle? I've only seen one angle, try as I might, and it was very unhelpful
Not that I'm aware of. More importantly is the PK turned down earlier in the game. If the game was bent, that would've been given
Sounds like a referee who felt he should have awarded the first penalty call and regretted not giving it. This may have had an effect on his thinking and he felt he had to make up for it.
Sounds like my driving testThat's a 'major' incident every 87 seconds
