Hi all
Observed today. Red team player gets to goal line and cuts along into area. Skips past blue player and player sticks a leg out to bring him down. Penalty no arguments. Ball runs through to keeper. I thought no DOGSO because, chance of player not reaching ball before the goalkeeper got it and other defenders around, albeit not in the way, but enough for me to go no DOGSO.
Anyway, I was observed so spoke after the game. Observer said that he wouldn’t have argued if I had sent him off for DOGSO. Then said but you didn’t even yellow card him.
Am I right in saying that if I had decided it was not DOGSO the only thing I could yellow card him for is a) reckless or b) stopping a promising attack of which I didn’t think it was that either because of the keeper getting the ball? Or should I have yellow carded for stopping promising attack?
Observed today. Red team player gets to goal line and cuts along into area. Skips past blue player and player sticks a leg out to bring him down. Penalty no arguments. Ball runs through to keeper. I thought no DOGSO because, chance of player not reaching ball before the goalkeeper got it and other defenders around, albeit not in the way, but enough for me to go no DOGSO.
Anyway, I was observed so spoke after the game. Observer said that he wouldn’t have argued if I had sent him off for DOGSO. Then said but you didn’t even yellow card him.
Am I right in saying that if I had decided it was not DOGSO the only thing I could yellow card him for is a) reckless or b) stopping a promising attack of which I didn’t think it was that either because of the keeper getting the ball? Or should I have yellow carded for stopping promising attack?