Raider025
The ref on the opposite side of the pond
I appreciate the feedback from everyone. Lets see if I can get to answering as much as I can.
Thank you. All I wanted to do is learn from this experience.Living and learning ... I like that.
Thanks, next time this happens, I'll try that out.@Raider025 If this " " " " incident " " " " happen again :
1/ Don't consider it as time wasting (from the losing team on a final ?!) unless it had actually delayed the start of the game, here there's been a goal, so the start isn't immediate
2/ If the GK really seems to be "inured" of he's simulating, (but you actually can't guess so just keep you YC in your pocket), go and see him "Hey what's wrong ?" "blablabla" "Oh I didn't see anything in this challenge, can only give what I see, hope you understand, let's get on with the game mate"
Here you go
Last year was only my 2nd season as a referee, so I was a little underknowledged as to that particular subject. I have been learning about as much as I could on refereeing in the US offseason, but looking back at it, this was a borderline embellishment call (wish I knew that last year when I called it).Don't you give cautions for 'embellishment' in the US? I'm sure I've seen it done in the MLS before now?
I appologize if I sounded arrogant or biased in anyway. My state of mind that day was slightly annoyed at the arrogance of the teams I officiated. Looking back at it, probably could've been less harsh on the canadian team, but it's said and done now. I simply wish to learn.Of course you can, though I'd be a bit slower too.
I suspect the OP just isn't describing the situation appropriately.
Personally I don't see how that comment is OFFINABUS either. If you have to have zero tolerance on swearing, fair enough. But if you're not in that area, then just follow the LOTG. Differentiate between swearing while making a comment and actually being abusive. The LOTG stopped stating 'foul language' is a red card offence a long time ago.
And seriously? Get over your anti-canadian bias. Stating you have less tolerance towards them when you're referring to a match with another team is effectively stating that you were biased that match.
You often find that teams in a different area than you're used to expect different tolerance levels from referees or play the game differently. As the referee it's your responsibility to administer the game appropriately. Deciding that all Canadian team need harsh treatment because one team once gave you a bit of dissent is just absurd - both the principle and the logic behind it.