The Ref Stop

Middlesbrough vs s Southampton

P

Peter Grove

RefChat Addict
The referee just collided with a Southampton player and stopped play when the ball was running through for a promising Middlesbrough attack.

Surely that's against the laws of the game. It's only a dropped ball if the referee makes contact with the ball - not a player?
 
The Ref Stop
Seen it before, probably falls under spirit of the game. You could argue the referee wouldn't be in a position to make a decision if something happened and they're on the floor or in a tangle with a player. Just got to be careful of the overall picture/situation.
 
wazztie16 said:
Seen it before, probably falls under spirit of the game. You could argue the referee wouldn't be in a position to make a decision if something happened and they're on the floor or in a tangle with a player. Just got to be careful of the overall picture/situation.
Click to expand...
In this case, the referee was neither on the floor nor tangled up and unable to make a decision. There was no valid reason to stop play, as far as I can tell.
 
This is the sort of thing Referees get their knickers in a twist about, the same referees that ignore tons of other Law
Besides, as it's not strictly covered in our Bible, we can act in the SPOG. I learnt a long time ago, this is the right thing to do
 
IFAB radically changed the concept of the referee when it made the ball hitting the ref a reason to (sometimes) stop play. Once that Law is in place, it’s a lot harder to say that a potentially more impactful interference by the referee is not a reason to stop play. (I recall this being discussed when the change was first made.) If we are going to have the ball-ref DB, there should be something done about collisions. Though that one is potentially more complicated, as players could intentionally run into the ref to try to get play stopped. I agree there is nothing in the Laws that support stopping play for the collision. But I’m hardly stressed if a ref decides to do so, either because of the impact on the ref or worry about an injury.
 
Hilly1618 said:
Did Shakespeare write this thread?

Much ado about nothing.
Click to expand...
I half agree. But, especially with VAR, we have moving more and more from the very long era of referee judgment (remember when a fould was defined by ITOOTR?) to a formulaic, checklist way of looking at the Laws. In that changing world, refs simply electing to stop play for a reason not set out in the LOTG is discordant. Though, as I posted above, I’m hardly stressed by it happening.
 
I was watching this… and the Middlesbrough players were rightly furious. I’d support a change in law, but until then, it was wrong in law.
 
Law 8 implcity allows the referee to stop play play whenever they deem necessary and the restart is not a free kick etc.

A dropped ball is the restart when the referee stops play and the Law does not require one of the above restarts.
Click to expand...

I'd say its hardly against the law or make up as you go. But it is a concept applied very inconsistently.
 
wazztie16 said:
Seen it before, probably falls under spirit of the game. You could argue the referee wouldn't be in a position to make a decision if something happened and they're on the floor or in a tangle with a player. Just got to be careful of the overall picture/situation.
Click to expand...
Doesn’t matter. If the referee is incapacitated, play may continue under the supervision of the other match officials until the ball goes out of play.
 
Johnson said:
Doesn’t matter. If the referee is incapacitated, play may continue under the supervision of the other match officials until the ball goes out of play.
Click to expand...
I can't imagine that going down well with at least one team in a Professional fixture, depending on the circumstances.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top