Yampy
RefChat Addict
I respectfully disagree with that argument. I appreciate the ball is in play once it hits the ground but the circumstances between a dropped ball restart and open play are very different. If a GK dives on the ball during a dropped ball restart he is putting himself in clear danger of getting hurt, almost certainly kicked and in the referees opinion could be deemed to be PIADM. Have you seen how two players will aggressively attack the ball in a contested dropped ball? It is not a tactic I would like to see any GK try.Why should it be? Would you consider it PIADM when the keeper dives down and catches a ball at a forward's feet in normal play? Would you card a keeper for it? And since a dropped ball is considered in normal play as soon as it hits the ground the keeper has the same right.
And to answer your question, yes I can imagine scenarios where I would - a GK dives with outstretched arms, but headlong towards the feet of the attacker is clearly acting in a manner which will get himself hurt. The law allows you to make that distinction and deal with it accordingly.
But as I said, the best policy is to avoid it in the first place, if you can.

