Allegedly there is a note on the promotion emails about keeping it confidential until 22nd Jan.
This does appear a bit daft. As it’s not going to affect assessment day results.Allegedly there is a note on the promotion emails about keeping it confidential until 22nd Jan.
Does make it very obvious who was promoted and who was picked so there is probably an optics element to itThis does appear a bit daft. As it’s not going to affect assessment day results.
I know nothing about "assessment day". i was promoted many. many years ago.Does make it very obvious who was promoted and who was picked so there is probably an optics element to it
Top places promoted. The next bunch are invited for assessment. Argument being that it is so tight in the tables and some referees have performed consistently over a number of years and just missing out, sometimes by a fraction, so it's another opportunity to demonstrate ready for next levelI know nothing about "assessment day". i was promoted many. many years ago.
What is this and how does it work? I thought just the top scoring people got promoted and that was that.
Why not just stick to the numbers and if you need 10 refs promote the top 10 scorers?Top places promoted. The next bunch are invited for assessment. Argument being that it is so tight in the tables and some referees have performed consistently over a number of years and just missing out, sometimes by a fraction, so it's another opportunity to demonstrate ready for next level
No idea. It's all new for this season. I believe there is fitness, laws of game exam, that sort of stuff.Why not just stick to the numbers and if you need 10 refs promote the top 10 scorers?
Who decides who is best on "assessment day" and how is this done?
As the other poster said is this all done fairly?
Apparently no "Longevity"The Assessment Day sniffs of an opportunity to positively discriminate to me
I wouldn't fancy knocking on 50, being male, heterosexual (except on weekends), agnostic, white as the driven snow and big & ugly
Or, the FA can use this to promote who they want regardless of where they lie in the tables....No idea. It's all new for this season. I believe there is fitness, laws of game exam, that sort of stuff.
If a referee finishes 11th, they have consistently performed well, but are denied a promotion they deserve, often by 0.01 of a mark.
I've seen so many great refs get held up by just being outside season on season.
It's fair in so much if you are one of the standout performer you go up. The rest get a chance to prove themselves, bearing in mind when we're down to 0.01 of a mark that there will always be variation in observers and the games observed on that might mean a referee who is performing better than someone above them doesn't go up.
Well no because you still need to be in that top percentile to be even get there in the 1st place .Or, the FA can use this to promote who they want regardless of where they lie in the tables....
Eh? Why on earth would they do that?Hopefully anybody involved with FA Core will refuse themselves from the selection process.
Lead to believe fitness is 1st on the assessment day, fail the fitness, you're out of the running.Nothing wrong with the selection day in theory but the inevitable lack of transparency will lead to accusations of favouritism.
Been a few who were promoted mid season and then couldn't pass the fitness test for the level.
I meant coaches etc not refereesEh? Why on earth would they do that?
Lead to believe fitness is 1st on the assessment day, fail the fitness, you're out of the running.
It's very clear it you operate at the level. Here is what was communicated at the start of the season...How are people chosen to go on the "assessment day"?
Is it the top few who didn't get promoted or is there a criteria you must meet to attend?
This all looks very unclear.