R Runner Ref RefChat Addict Jan 17, 2025 #21 JamesL said: Sorry I thought you couldn't find the wording for VC negligible contact. Click to expand... I meant the guidance for VC. I remember there being some to say they didn’t want Schar incident being red. But can’t find it.
JamesL said: Sorry I thought you couldn't find the wording for VC negligible contact. Click to expand... I meant the guidance for VC. I remember there being some to say they didn’t want Schar incident being red. But can’t find it.
JamesL Moderator Staff member Level 3 Referee Jan 17, 2025 #22 Runner Ref said: I meant the guidance for VC. I remember there being some to say they didn’t want Schar incident being red. But can’t find it. Click to expand... Was it on Mic'd up? They usually do a written summary of what Webb says.
Runner Ref said: I meant the guidance for VC. I remember there being some to say they didn’t want Schar incident being red. But can’t find it. Click to expand... Was it on Mic'd up? They usually do a written summary of what Webb says.
R Runner Ref RefChat Addict Jan 17, 2025 #23 JamesL said: Was it on Mic'd up? They usually do a written summary of what Webb says. Click to expand... No no. There is as guidance sent out to say they don’t want minimal contact being VC. I think it was sent out via PGMOL rather than to the masses
JamesL said: Was it on Mic'd up? They usually do a written summary of what Webb says. Click to expand... No no. There is as guidance sent out to say they don’t want minimal contact being VC. I think it was sent out via PGMOL rather than to the masses
R RefereeX RefChat Addict Level 3 Referee Jan 17, 2025 #24 I’m genuinely surprised by how many people think it’s a red card. I just don’t think I could call it SFP or VC…
I’m genuinely surprised by how many people think it’s a red card. I just don’t think I could call it SFP or VC…