Morning everyone,
Please can I have thoughts on this. Incident is at 08:35
Incident
Both players holding each other, maybe defender slightly more, but attacker defo looking for it.
Any alternative decisions for this - drop ball, let the game play on etc...
Watch the whole clip im sure you would have red carded him....the guy got away with 2 previous straight redsNot sure I’d be going red at 21:11 Yellow for SPA
Doesn't make the offence at 21.11 any more red...Watch the whole clip im sure you would have red carded him....the guy got away with 2 previous straight reds
It sounds like he was on a yellow already so easiest second yellow of my life to send him off.Watch the whole clip im sure you would have red carded him....the guy got away with 2 previous straight reds
I disagree, the intent was there to hurt the player, the ball was goneDoesn't make the offence at 21.11 any more red...
Nailed on yellow for me - nothing more, nothing less.I disagree, the intent was there to hurt the player, the ball was gone
I think it wasn't to hurt but to stop the attack, so more like a yellow for stopping a promising attackI disagree, the intent was there to hurt the player, the ball was gone
They were 4-0 down don't think he cared about conceding.....I think it wasn't to hurt but to stop the attack, so more like a yellow for stopping a promising attack
That’s a very odd mentality, are you saying it can’t be SPA or DOGSO at 4-0?They were 4-0 down don't think he cared about conceding.....
All personal opinion here not generalising all events similar to this, never said it couldn't be SPA/DOGSO, I've watched the clip and seen what that player has done previous in the game, he should have been red carded twice before this incident. None of us will know his exact intent except him, in my opinion and noting his previous interactions in this game that was excessive force.That’s a very odd mentality, are you saying it can’t be SPA or DOGSO at 4-0?
Are you applying the same mentality, but the reverse cards, if say at 4-0, a player trips a player up who’s going through on goal. YC for the trip but nothing for DOGSO because its 4-0 so he wouldn't have cared about conceding?
I think he means the opposite in that he was just taking his opponent out.That’s a very odd mentality, are you saying it can’t be SPA or DOGSO at 4-0?
Are you applying the same mentality, but the reverse cards, if say at 4-0, a player trips a player up who’s going through on goal. YC for the trip but nothing for DOGSO because its 4-0 so he wouldn't have cared about conceding?
a solid red card at 21.11 and does not even show a yellow, amongst other decisions.