The decision hinges on the first Forest defender to play the ball,
The 2nd Forest play can easily be justified as interfering by the player in an offside position yet that is not the key decision,
Now was the first clearance deliberate or not. The IFAB advice and video examples would suggest that in my opinion it was deliberate
https://www.theifab.com/news/law-11-offside-deliberate-play-guidelines-clarified/
Video 3 and 6 would suggest that the Forest clearance could easily fit those examples.
I think it is just too subjective as one refs deliberate is another's not deliberate.
I would go as far as to say that to sort it much like the goal scored with the hand principle is that all opponents touches other than a save or off the frame of the goal is a reset.
The 2nd Forest play can easily be justified as interfering by the player in an offside position yet that is not the key decision,
Now was the first clearance deliberate or not. The IFAB advice and video examples would suggest that in my opinion it was deliberate
https://www.theifab.com/news/law-11-offside-deliberate-play-guidelines-clarified/
Video 3 and 6 would suggest that the Forest clearance could easily fit those examples.
I think it is just too subjective as one refs deliberate is another's not deliberate.
I would go as far as to say that to sort it much like the goal scored with the hand principle is that all opponents touches other than a save or off the frame of the goal is a reset.