YouTubeLink↓
Scene(3:45)
In this J1 League match, the referee whistled for a foul and sent off a Kyoto Sanga player for DOGSO.
However, another Shonan Bellmare attacker was also breaking through, and a clear goal-scoring opportunity seemed to persist.
Given that it was still early in the match and Shonan was already leading by one goal, do you think applying advantage would have been better, or was the red card more "beneficial" in the long run?
Personally, I believe the red card was the right choice. Securing a numerical superiority for the majority of the game, while already having the lead, likely provided a greater tactical advantage for Shonan than allowing the play to continue.
Scene(3:45)
In this J1 League match, the referee whistled for a foul and sent off a Kyoto Sanga player for DOGSO.
However, another Shonan Bellmare attacker was also breaking through, and a clear goal-scoring opportunity seemed to persist.
Given that it was still early in the match and Shonan was already leading by one goal, do you think applying advantage would have been better, or was the red card more "beneficial" in the long run?
Personally, I believe the red card was the right choice. Securing a numerical superiority for the majority of the game, while already having the lead, likely provided a greater tactical advantage for Shonan than allowing the play to continue.
Last edited:

