Xman
Member
Let us first of all take pride in the fact that we are a community run by referees for referees, a position in football which is often diluted by nonsensical punditry logic and punters' interpretations on the best way to officiate the laws of the game, with barely any understanding or attempt to grasp the realities of what it is actually like to referee a game.
While most of the chat on here is very supportive and helpful for may members, I have occasionally come across the odd thread where referees on TV are being slated for certain decisions or their performance in general. Whether or not these criticisms are merited, I think it is rather detrimental to the idea of refereeing being a close-knit community. After all, if our aspirations are in the right place, it could eventually be one of us in that position, which I'm sure many of us will not understand in terms of the intense extra pressure added by TV cameras and crowds numbering the thousands.
What I was thinking in future is that instead of threads opened to have a go at senior referees, maybe the future focus could be on when it is accepted that mistakes have been made, we can open discussion into why the mistakes were made, how could it have been avoided etc. With the focus being on improving your own game based on difficulties faced by others and what can be learned from these.
These are just my thoughts, and maybe the moderators may wish to have their say on this, but I would prefer discussions like "(Referee's name) could have done better to anticipate play on the break to ensure that he was closer to the action when the decision was to be made" rather than "(Referee's name) had an absolute shocker and must have supported that team in his childhood or something because that was a joke." I'm sure no one would accept comments like that from a player in a game they were refereeing, so why promote such criticism on a referee-only forum.
Let's be diplomatic lads!
While most of the chat on here is very supportive and helpful for may members, I have occasionally come across the odd thread where referees on TV are being slated for certain decisions or their performance in general. Whether or not these criticisms are merited, I think it is rather detrimental to the idea of refereeing being a close-knit community. After all, if our aspirations are in the right place, it could eventually be one of us in that position, which I'm sure many of us will not understand in terms of the intense extra pressure added by TV cameras and crowds numbering the thousands.
What I was thinking in future is that instead of threads opened to have a go at senior referees, maybe the future focus could be on when it is accepted that mistakes have been made, we can open discussion into why the mistakes were made, how could it have been avoided etc. With the focus being on improving your own game based on difficulties faced by others and what can be learned from these.
These are just my thoughts, and maybe the moderators may wish to have their say on this, but I would prefer discussions like "(Referee's name) could have done better to anticipate play on the break to ensure that he was closer to the action when the decision was to be made" rather than "(Referee's name) had an absolute shocker and must have supported that team in his childhood or something because that was a joke." I'm sure no one would accept comments like that from a player in a game they were refereeing, so why promote such criticism on a referee-only forum.
Let's be diplomatic lads!