The Leicester defender knew exactly what he was doing. Good to see cheating not prospering.
So you actually think, the player has made a conscious decision to handle the ball to stop the progress of an attacker who was going absolutely nowhere?
Just pause for a moment and think about it.
it was clear handballI think it was a penalty, as I've said, but can see why you may not give it.
The thing I'm most bemused by is the description of the incident as a "blunder" etc. on Madley's part. It's a very tight call, with convincing arguments from both sides. The way some people have been talking you'd think it's a clear cut call to make.
it was clear handball
it worries me if the people who are saying it was not deliberate are actually referees. blimey
Sure was. Hand to ball. Simple as. The only time it's not handball (certainly within the penalty area) is when the ball it kicked onto your hand. It's really that simple 99.9% of the time.
Page of LOTG please.
And refs, as this forum will attest to, have all sorts of opinions. On pretty much everything.
I think that's exactly what happened. I think the arm has come across to block the attacker and once he's touched the ball he's panicked and kind of flicked it away in an attempt to get it off him.wow,i can see WHY people, like @deusex , say it isn't a penalty as it does seem a little harsh ... but his arms are not at a natural position and he has changed the direction of the ball - you could argue that he has tried to hold back the Tottenham attacker which has made him handle the ball
IMO - Penalty