@SLI39 you cant give them offinabus/fouls and misconduct. its a big can of worms. you cant send someone off for something u havent seen.
An example, a player commits VC against an opponent. you dont see it. 2 scenarios 1 with NAR and 1 with CAR
1. with NAR, he'll call you over, tell u what he has seen then YOU decide the sanction i.e. red card. Both you and your NAR submit a report via wholegame system and it is dealt with.
2 with CAR. all the above is thesame except how would a club CAR submit a report, and write in the correct way. without it how would your report stand up against an appeal?
For me as i said when i opened this thread its in and out and the direction only, I'd be very worried giving anything else given some of the misunderstandings I've heard re new laws on tv and from people i know.
I do agree that the referee's decision takes precedence and is always final.
But the refusal to accept the CAR's word gives the impression they are second-class citizens where football is concerned.
I've had two incidents over seven years of refereeing where I felt I had to ignore claims of abuse by CARs because I didn't hear the words spoken. It's hard for misconduct to be taken seriously in a report if it's hearsay.
Also, yes, current reporting structures make it difficult for referees to incorporate the testament of CARs. However, I had been led to believe there was a way for parents to submit complementary reports.