This may be a good idea but i do not own a smart phone. Mine just does calls and texts.
But you obviously have Internet access. The only smart phone dependent is the app. Pdf, blogs, emails, refchat, all just online resources no need for a smart phone.
You can't plead ignorance because your county FA aren't spoon feeding you. You are technically self employed when refereeing, and therefore you are responsible for your own learning.
If a sparky came to your house and installed the older type of electrical cabling, would you accept if he said he hadn't seen that bit of training. You wouldn't, you'd expect him to be up to date with the latest regulations.
Same here, when you step onto the field, the players, clubs, spectators expect you to be up to date with law.
The law couldn't be any clearer now in my opinion, it may not be favourable, and we may not like it, but we can't really say its not clearer than it was.
LOTG moved away from intent along time ago, and handball I think was the only one that was behind in thst respect ie having to judge a deliberate (intentional) act.
Now we have, it's deliberate, that's when its obvious we know the player deliberately handled the ball eg save on goal line, and now there is set criteria for when a handball is punished and is not punished (when not deliberate) and law 5 still exists... In the opinion of the referee within the framework of the laws etc.
This particular incident, you can punish the piadm if you want. But it could also be argued that the wolves player was also piadm leading in with his elbow like that. If CW doesn't got for the overhead and instead attempts a header, and the wolves player clatter him with his elbow, it's an easy pen. And more than likely a sanction.
The law clearly says if the hand or arm is extended above Or BEYOND the shoulder its a hand ball. The arm is clearly extended beyond the shoulder. The unnatural bit isnt really what we are considering although you could argue he has made himself unnaturally bigger as well.