Peter Grove
RefChat Addict
If that were an attacker doing the same thing to a defender as they cleared the ball, it would be a foul and a yellow card, 99 times out of a hundred.Yes I'd say that is clear enough for VAR to intervene.
If that were an attacker doing the same thing to a defender as they cleared the ball, it would be a foul and a yellow card, 99 times out of a hundred.Yes I'd say that is clear enough for VAR to intervene.
The VAR should have reviewed the attacking phase of play (from the time Argentina gained possession). So either the VAR didn't think the push by Argentina was a clear and obvious error, or the VAR screwed up.I am confused
Messi’s VAR pen - how can they give the pen if there is a big two handed shove the other way off the ball just before?
The second offside goal - really? - no graphics here.
But great goals!
Oh lord - that would be a giant c*** up!The VAR should have reviewed the attacking phase of play (from the time Argentina gained possession). So either the VAR didn't think the push by Argentina was a clear and obvious error, or the VAR screwed up.
I think this is the play you are talking about re OS--I don't have an image from the automated system, but this image is from a twitter post purporting to show that the automated system failed and used the wrong defender:
View attachment 6160
I am not endorsing the claim--I have no reason to believe that the lines drawn here are more accurate than the fancy system used for automated OS--I'm only sharing because it is a screen shot that is presumably at least close to the proper magic moment.
Yeah it was a crazy tight call, maybe an inch offside at the 't-shirt line'Oh lord - that would be a giant c*** up!
Did anyone watch live and see the offside animation?
I wonder the Argentine press are saying…
The top of the shoulder is beyond the line in the graphic so we'll above the bottom of the armpit line. Also what that graphic should have is a horizontal line which indicates where line is drawn in respect of the bottom of the armpit which would then square off the offside part of the anatomyUnder the armpit offside line rule, I think that probably would have qualified as onside, but as we all now know, the sleeve line is what matters for handball and therefore, also offside.
The line in that graphic is actually set at the defending player's foot, so it's all of the shirt-covered arm being off that has meant this is called - relative to some other decisions, that's actually fairly clear!
So glad we have VAR to clearly identify these objective, "it is or it isn't 100% of the time" offside decisions.
Yep, definitely my preferenceSo glad we have VAR to clearly identify these objective, "it is or it isn't 100% of the time" offside decisions.
Say what you will about professional soccer in the US, but you'll never convince me that the way offside VAR decisions are handled in MLS and Liga MX (no lines, call on the field stands unless the video clearly shows the call is wrong) is the wrong way to review offside decisions.
Yep my preference too.So glad we have VAR to clearly identify these objective, "it is or it isn't 100% of the time" offside decisions.
Say what you will about professional soccer in the US, but you'll never convince me that the way offside VAR decisions are handled in MLS and Liga MX (no lines, call on the field stands unless the video clearly shows the call is wrong) is the wrong way to review offside decisions.
The problem is that it's a guess, and it's a guess that will be easily shown up the very first time a broadcaster does draw lines and "proves" that the AR and then VAR were wrong. I don't buy that this system really offers any improvement over leaving it with the on-field official, and I don't buy that the idea we should just accept a VAR official getting decisions "clearly wrong" would last more than a week in the PL.So glad we have VAR to clearly identify these objective, "it is or it isn't 100% of the time" offside decisions.
Say what you will about professional soccer in the US, but you'll never convince me that the way offside VAR decisions are handled in MLS and Liga MX (no lines, call on the field stands unless the video clearly shows the call is wrong) is the wrong way to review offside decisions.
The clearly wrong decisions do get caught by the MLS system. I don’t recall seeing a play that was clearly wrong that didn’t get caught. The close but wrong decisions, not all the time. So the improvement is that there are not the really bad decisions—which in theory was what VAR was about when it started.The problem is that it's a guess, and it's a guess that will be easily shown up the very first time a broadcaster does draw lines and "proves" that the AR and then VAR were wrong. I don't buy that this system really offers any improvement over leaving it with the on-field official, and I don't buy that the idea we should just accept a VAR official getting decisions "clearly wrong" would last more than a week in the PL.
No more of a guess than someone choosing the frame of when a ball is kicked, the right offside point for the attackers, and the right offside point for the defenders.The problem is that it's a guess, and it's a guess that will be easily shown up the very first time a broadcaster does draw lines and "proves" that the AR and then VAR were wrong. I don't buy that this system really offers any improvement over leaving it with the on-field official, and I don't buy that the idea we should just accept a VAR official getting decisions "clearly wrong" would last more than a week in the PL.