There is a difference between the referee enjoying himself, and the game existing for the referee's enjoyment. I would agree with the statement "Referees should enjoy the game as much as the players and spectators" but don't think I can agree with "The game is as much..."
The referee is free to enjoy himself, but the game is there for the purpose of the enjoyment of players and spectatorsI don't see the difference with the two, care to elaborate?
At the same time, if you were did make it to that level, and you hated it every weekend and dreaded it, I'm sure you wouldn't stay there for long. To referee regularly, there must be a sense of enjoyment, otherwise you wouldn't do it anymore. Of course, there are times when you don't enjoy a certain game, but those can't happen every weekend and you still referee week in week out.
Not necessarily. What if you were getting an extremely large amount of abuse on every game, players screaming at you and so on, meaning you wouldn't enjoy it.No you wouldn't stay for long but it would be because of your fault, not the fault of the game.
Not everyone can handle the criticism though? That is down to their personal character and that alone.That's not the game's fault -- it's your fault that you can't handle the criticism. The game doesn't change whether the players are angels or devils.
But that might just be you. Others might not expect any abuse, and hate it when they get yelled at.And fwiw, I actually don't so much mind the ones where I'm getting yelled and cursed at - as a matter of fact, at this point, I expect at higher level matches.
Not everyone can handle the criticism though? That is down to their personal character and that alone.
But that might just be you. Others might not expect any abuse, and hate it when they get yelled at.
But it is the game in the way that the game is making them feeling that way...Yeah, and that's their fault, not the game's.