it happens very quickly so it would still be credible to take a second (literally) to see what is going to happen before blowing for the penalty.Just because the player put it in, doesn't mean the ref should have played advantage. A penalty was a much better chance. The scorer still had a lot to to. I've blown for a pen only for a player to smack it in the top corner from 18 yards. Was I incorrect? No.
Advantage in the area is far more trouble than it's worth.
This is similar to an incident that happened during the 2013 FIFA Confederation Cup match between Brazil and Italy. At first the referee whistled for a penalty but when he saw a goal has been scored he changed his decision and awarded a goal. But I am not sure if it was the right thing to do. There were no complains after the match. The match ended 4-2 in Brazil's favor.
I am not sure because I wanna hear from you guys.How could you not be sure ? This is a technical mistake, when the ref blows the whistle he stops the game, the only two solutions here were penalty or drop ball
How could you not be sure ?
Not necessary for you to say that. In such a situation, I'll do what I think is right.As the well-known football chant would have it
'FIFA Ref, he'll do what he wants'