The Ref Stop

Search results

  1. R

    Germany vs Paraguay

    It is, yes. Remember they only have to have part of one foot touching part of the line (or behind / above it). Sometimes that can be quite deceiving to appear that they were off the line when they weren't. Also remember they're only penalised if they are off the line and the shot is saved by...
  2. R

    Germany vs Paraguay

    According to LOTG instructions, goal line / goal area intersection is correct, but whether this differs when VAR is in operation I don't know. (LOTG suggests goal line / penalty area for in match penalties which allows AR back to position, and goal line / goal area for shootouts, but I also...
  3. R

    Germany vs Paraguay

    The contact is actually very minimal and only with the trailing leg. Player had completely lost his head granted, but the outcome was only a reckless tackle. Had he made contact with his leading leg it might have been a different story. Regarding the disallowed goal, I’d be more comfortable if...
  4. R

    L7-6 promotion

    As I understand it, friendlies are absolutely correct to count towards the 5 games for qualification but that is as far as they can be used. I may well be wrong however, but yes, best to check
  5. R

    L7-6 promotion

    I wouldn't say this with absolute certainty, but I'm at least 80% sure that if your county allowed that, they were kind of wrong to do so by the FA's guidelines regarding it.
  6. R

    IFAB changes for 26-27

    I just feel like the whole 10 second sub thing is pointless but whenever a team are trying to wind down the clock that player will be ‘injured’ thus cancelling the 10 second rule. I hope I’m proved wrong.
  7. R

    Ecuador v Germany

    I think it’s a language difference. Subjective as the opposite of factual, every decision bar offside / ball in and out of play etc will be, no matter how obvious it is
  8. R

    Ecuador v Germany

    I can (just) about accept an opinion that the degree of contact was massively exaggerated by the Ecuador player and isn't significant enough for a foul given he clearly wins the ball... but if you're unsure in these situations.... football expectation... it just needs to be a foul. Surprised to...
  9. R

    England v Ghana

    I hate the format more than anyone as if you can't finish in the top 2 of your group you don't deserve to go through, and Portugal winning Euro 2016 having finished 3rd in their group and not won a single match in 90 mins other than their Semi Final against Wales is the perfect example of why...
  10. R

    Penalty shootout coin toss proposed change

    Easier to segregate away fans if they have their own stand I'd imagine, but obviously that vastly depends on the size of the stadium as to whether they'd have the whole stand or just a section of it.
  11. R

    Penalty shootout coin toss proposed change

    It's considered a win by football people if you get the shootout in front of your own fans
  12. R

    England v Ghana

    Having watched it again, I actually do think it's probably a pen and should have resulted in a VAR intervention. It's the fact Konsa's flailing leg lands on top of the knee of the Ghana attacker that causes him to stumble I think.
  13. R

    England v Ghana

    Maybe it's the England bias in me but I don't think the Konsa penalty is stonewall by any means. He doesn't get the ball, but he also doesn't get a lot of the man who seemed to fall over anyway, all very messy and the ball went through regardless. Had it been given, I don't think it's wrong, but...
  14. R

    England v Ghana

    Think we got on the lucky end of 2 KMIs that could have gone differently. I do think no foul against Konsa and not dogso for Pickford are probably better outcomes, but if given the other way I doubt VAR would have intervened.
  15. R

    Belgium - Iran

    You would have thought the players would have learned from / adapted to his approach but they just didn't seem to.
  16. R

    Belgium - Iran

    To be fair, regardless of the protocol, if that can't be disallowed by VAR (and it should be spotted on field) then something is wrong. The player who was within 1m of the wall didn't just happen to stand too close, he backed in to the end player on the wall holding him off to stop that player...
  17. R

    Belgium - Iran

    which it could be argued he did.
  18. R

    Belgium - Iran

    Yeah he clearly didn’t fancy his chances of scoring, but there is a little tug so VAR can’t overrule
  19. R

    Belgium - Iran

    Lots of talk about offside for the disallowed goal but not a single mention of the fact it had to be disallowed anyway as an attacker moved within 1m of the wall when the kick was taken
  20. R

    Canada vs Qatar

    If the tackle was a genuine and unfortunate attempt for the ball, I’d be more sympathetic, but while it wasn’t a typical SFP tackle it wasn’t great, particularly the secondary leg movement (IIRC, I’m not going back to try and find it again)
Back
Top