Search results

Its red card for the handball and a penalty but don't sweat it, it's a learning process that you only get better with more games and experience 👍 As for glasses, yes, it's guidance as per the above. I always ask if lenses are plastic (they nearly all are these days) and advise about safety...

Great scenario that, well done that referee 👍

At a ladies game a couple of weeks ago the only person I warned about dissent was a lady I know is a referee .... (Was borderline sin bin)

No goal for me, I've no idea how AR can give that from his position. Had 2 of these a few weeks ago in the same match, both not given. If I'm not sure, it's not a goal

Off topic but congrats on getting L4 @Samuel 👍

I'm in the start watches and blow camp, then check they're going in a few secs after KO

That looks nailed on DOGSO red to me, even from his angle. The attacker was definitely shooting into an open net. A very bizarre decision. As for the other cards, I'd be distancing myself from the players there rather than hanging about to argue it. Bet his score was 60.0000001 though 😄

No, we don't LOL I actually didn't see it in the ground (eyes following the ball) but after looking at the TV replays, for me, I'd like a red there. He just aims for Wlaton and launches himself in the air at him, despite the ball being played on the ground some seconds earlier. What was wierd...

João Pedro (remember him and his elbow?) collides with Christian Walton. Poss red card? https://www.skysports.com/football/video/35527/13290449/should-brightons-joao-pedro-have-seen-red-for-this-challenge-on-ipswich-goalkeeper-christian-walton

I don't see this 'reflex' bit in the IFAB law book. Is it a genuine "Correct in Law" consideration? To me, his left hand is up in the air and nowhere near his face. I'd go pen. (ducks)

72% of us voting it as a penalty.... Inc me. Annoyed it wasn't given as the extra goal would have put Ipswich up to 17th. Glad it wasn't the last match of the season!

Ooh, 1st time seeing his words. Red has copped out there. Can it be retrospectively looked at?

Not seen the Davis yellow/red but all 3 pens were correct and I'd be deffo booking Wilson for dissent. Plus Silva. And also another Fulham player who threw the ball down (it's in the law as ana example FFS!)

Hmm, maybe, after looking at the replay etc... in real time, I reckon it's a margin call

Connected to his shoulder I'd suggest.

Because I think his arm isn't that close to the body

I agree,I'd give handball for it if I saw it. I don't think referee did see it hence under law it was ok.

Spurs play out from the back, get pressed and kick hits pressing Toon player's arm which is in "a natural position". Bounces to teammate who plays in Gordon for the goal. I watched it on TV live and thought it should stand as not h/b as per law, and it did!

Wow, that's unbelievable! How can any referee look at the video and see an offside? And yes, I think ball was moving when taken.

Yep, I agree, I'm waving it off and departing for this, it's a non-event