Search results

Sounds like the type of challenge that if their team did it, the supporters would say it was hard but fair, yet if it was the opposing team it, they'd say it was dangerous 🤦‍♂️

Wasn't she holding her head, even though the contact wasn't even on that part of her body ? 🤦‍♂️

You just know the crowds in the professional game will be doing the countdown from the stands and demanding a corner as soon as the 8 seconds are up. By the way (unless i've missed this) but how do you know which side they should take the corner from ?

It's the same with a lot of these new laws / campaigns. It'll be hot topic to start with, and the occasional corner kick will be given on TV for all to see, but after a while it'll fizzle out just like the 6 secs rule, crowding refs etc. The countdown from 5 secs seems to me to be for TV...

I think there is a clear benefit to the player though, that's why they've decided to take it from there. They're throwing it straight to their keeper who has very little opposition, as opposed to the halfway line where players are marked up

You can't base decisions on how much teams are moaning. Once teams recognise this, they'll be moaning about everything

🤦‍♂️

Hmmm good point. I know headwear is a no go, but turbans are allowed as they're religious

I think they're confusing the word "busiest" with "best"

I thought sin bins were for dissent, not for not following instructions ?

Just change the culture of the game back to the way it was, and they'll be much less cheating aswell

Cheers. Or we just say "we'll just let 21 players stand here and wait until you do. I've got all day !" lol

TBH we had a ref sec a few years ago, that did just that. He allocated the refs to the best behaved teams first (from the marks given by the opposition) and let the clubs with the worst reputation do it themselves

Fair point, but if we all did that, who refs youth football, then ?

I didn't think a player could play with any type of jewellery. I check them before KO and refuse let them play unless it's removed (they soon remove it lol). I'll have to check the LOTG regarding cautioning them if it's during the match etc. I'm sure (if I had missed it prior to KO) I would have...

Exactly ! Therefore, could VAR have intervened as playing on was a clear and obvious error ?

I think it'll be too start / stop doing that. It'll be like american football and will go on for 3 hours !

Isn't it done with fact based decisions in other sports, though ? ie IN/OUT in tennis, hitting the stumps in cricket. Yes, the handball would have been fact based, but the penalty is still subjective. Also, how would city have known it was outside the area ? Would they have their own cameras...

Don't like the idea of a challenge based system. Once you encourage the idea that referee decisions can be challenged, I think you're treaded dangerous ground and it would be a nightmare at grassroots.

I totally understand that, but this is a shocking decision. Maybe a game of this magnitude should have cameras looking at all areas of the match. The BBC showed the correct angle within seconds