Search results

That would be difficult given that leagues do not handle discipline and suspensions (not to mention that it was a FA Cup match, not a league game)! 😉

Showing a lack of respect for the game? 😏

Not sure what the problem is here - the shot deflects off Red #4. Notice how none of the Red players are surprised or argue that a corner is given. Not to mention that Nyberg has been in the Elite category for nearly three years now.

31 games as referee and 10 as AR this season. On a forced sabbatical from L4 after heart surgery in 2024 - still hopeful I'll eventually be able to pass the fitness test again.

I don't think so. Taken from the BBC's article: Seems pretty cut and dry to be honest.

Tried that on one of my old ones that was almost ready for the bin... it only hastened its demise.

Along similar lines, can anyone point me in the direction of a cheap circular/oval red card? Cheapest I can find the card alone is £5.98 inc. p&p, or £6.99 for the cheapest hockey set!

I think the announcement of the decision should have emphasised the excessive force aspect of it - the high (glancing) contact wasn't the main reason it was SFP rather than reckless IMO.

From memory, for Palmer's caution the whistle went just after the goalkeeper had released the ball - it should be pretty exceptional circumstances for a referee to play advantage when a team are in their own defensive third, and I don't think the referee was wrong for stopping play to caution...

The defender’s actions were reckless IMO, nothing more than that. I'd also argue that the only reason anyone's safety was endangered was the attacker attempting to head the ball at waist height, threatening injury to himself.

I'm happy with a caution here - I don't think there's enough force used by the defender to deem it "excessive". Had the contact occurred at a greater height then I think a red would be more arguable.

I can just about understand a referee giving a yellow for it on-field in real time, but for the VAR to say that it's an obvious missed red card, and then for the referee to watch it back and agree with him... the mind boggles.

Seems odd to say he headbutted him when he didn't 🤷‍♂️

🤣 no, he didn't.

Every individual match is going to differ based on how the teams play, how often play is stopped and how often the ball is out of play. Worry less about the overall distance you're covering, and just make sure you're a credible distance from play and that you've got a good angle.

Overall movement is towards goal, ball ends up entering penalty area, although the fouled attacker would have regained possession prior to that anyway had he not been fouled - and would have had an open goal to shoot at from a very reasonable angle and distance, before the defender tracking back...

How is that not DOGSO?

It's definitely DOGSO - direction of play is towards goal and the attacker would have regained control had it not been for the foul. He doesn't go "studs up" on his knee - it's the side of the boot that's making contact. Reckless trip, not SFP to me.

One small but important point of law - for the first caution, if you haven't submitted it yet, put it down as C4 not C5, as a caution for failing to respect the required distance would be incorrect in law here 🙂

If my memory serves me correctly, there used to be guidance from The FA that a plain wedding band could be taped up if it couldn't be removed (despite the LotG explicitly prohibiting "any kind of jewellery" since 1997).