Search results

Yes they should change the wording to taking part in the penalty shootout out. And it they really wanted to bolt and lock it they could add "in any capacity"

I always try not to prejudge it. I've been given the nightmare game, you know the ones the ref sec rings you before to say why he's a putting you on it and it's gone swimmingly so always no prejudgment. Just approach it like a normal game but know in the back of your mind that you may need to...

Ok so step 7 v step 6 in county cup..that makes sense. So I would guess that the referee is probably going 5-4 and needs to be observed on a competition using neutral assistant referees. Despite you belief about the referees readiness they are on the pathway and have to be given an opportunity...

Is it a step 6/7 game? If it's step 6 then they are a level 4 referee or at least on promotion pathway. RDOs don't normally do appointments. These are usually handled by a dedicated person at the CFA or the league. Methods are usually availability of refs, availability of observers if the...

Replaying the penalties is practical at professional level where the players that were involved will be available to take part but at this level it's possible that the players that were eligible to take part may not be available on the scheduled date and so you're not really replying the penalty...

Can't see the clip as I don't use Facebook.

Ah right yes. I took it as no subs remaining. Well then they would be an outside agent in that case. We'd have them removed. I don't think the answer changes an awful lot though. They are removed. Original player can come back on as they have not been substituted out and we report the facts to...

They aren't an outside agent they are still a substitute player. They don't lose their status as a substitute once all substitutions are made. They are still named on the list of subs that should be provided to the referee before the match and so are treat in that capacity throughout the match...

Or a replay depends on competition rules and precedents I guess. What happens with the game after is largely not our concern. One other step I would take, if I was absolutely certain, is that the player who has entered without permission has to leave with a caution. The player that should be...

No issue there step 3 is 5 subs from 5 opportunities.

Competition rules. Only the names of the subs are required in law. A copy of sheet handed to the referee becomes the master copy and prevents any post exchange tampering or similar

The way that step 1 refs are evaluated there's absolutely no need to look for/find KMIs. Arguably at all national league system (UK) games the making system has moved away mark inflation from finding supportable KMIs. The referee obviously feels it's an attacking foul and as such once he...

I genuinely think nothing is the best outcome. Nothing severe enough occurs to penalise either player.

Play on... Next! 😏

There's always a third option...

Agree apart from the last bit. I would say until they have had time to get up.

Can't possibly be as no one is enforcing it... Allegedly.

15-20 mins. Gentle Jog around pitch Individual stretching Shuttles x 12 Speed activation which consists of touchline to touchline jog to centre circle, sprint through centre circle jog to touchline and back 4 reps.

You're not wrong but in the context of the post I was replying to he is, potentially, an equivalent level of the ref, albeit in a different pathway.

Perhaps yes. Fair point. But technically that is supposed to be an equivalent level, no?