ladbroke8745
RefChat Addict
How was a free kick not given for a foul on Kane?
Norway Vs England
- Thread starter bester
- Start date
SpiderCam, SpiderCam, does whatever a spider can. Spins a web any size, deflects balls just like flies.
Look out. Here comes the SpiderCam.
Clement probably just sick of seeing him rolling around on the floor. So embarrassing.
This isn’t confirmed btw, just what someone told me they’d said!
Hard luck tonight! You acquitted yourselves incredibly well. Was billed as Kane vs Haaland and neither turned up on the night. But fortunately we have a Jude and he just about made the difference!
Last edited:
santa sangria
RefChat Addict
Quite disappointed with the officials. Maybe the heat was a factor for Turpin.
Couple of wrong offsides, a lot of missed fouls, several incorrect KMIs, rerefereeing with selective arbitrary forensics… turned his back on play missing the “foul”’on Kane, looked sluggish generally…
But the thing i hated most… what is the point of introducing counts for GKs and TIs if you then allow players to delay the game by kicking the ball away. I get it, the refs have been told not to card, but joking with the Norway captain twice about it, and not even bothering warning players from both sides … argh… presents so badly… and is rubbish for us at grassroots.
(Jed Spence I salute you!)
Couple of wrong offsides, a lot of missed fouls, several incorrect KMIs, rerefereeing with selective arbitrary forensics… turned his back on play missing the “foul”’on Kane, looked sluggish generally…
But the thing i hated most… what is the point of introducing counts for GKs and TIs if you then allow players to delay the game by kicking the ball away. I get it, the refs have been told not to card, but joking with the Norway captain twice about it, and not even bothering warning players from both sides … argh… presents so badly… and is rubbish for us at grassroots.
(Jed Spence I salute you!)
It wasn’t that person who told me this btw@RefereeX Is he still confident the technology was 100% right for the offside?
that person is in the know (he officiated on a game in the last 48 hours)The one who told me this was my brother who read it on the internet somewhere
Likewise the Bellingham answer.
If only our politicians could answer like that - straight up honesty and not taking the bait, but throwing straight back at them.
I've seen two videos of this, one shows absolutely no evidence of the ball hitting a cable and moving, the other shows a clear change in direction of the ball. They can't both be right so I can only assume a case of fake AI here.
For me there’s a big difference in this.
Yes there’s a bit of a push here but it is as part of a challenge for the ball, where as Haaland clearly pushed Anderson with 2 hands not as any part of any challenge.
Anderson probably could have stayed standing, but in a world of VAR they didn’t have much choice
There was a field goal in the NFL last season in which one angle made it look like the ball 100% hit the camera wire but other angles eventually showed the wire was no where near the path of the kick. I'm willing to keep my mind open that nothing actually happened despite the path of the ball looking strange.
one
RefChat Addict
Is the ball sensor tech designed to pick contact with 'things'? Not sure. But it definitely looked like something changed the trajectory of the ball. Maybe a sudden gust of wind? Can the video evidence trump the sensor tech? There is precedent for video evidence overriding GLT on multiple occasions.
Other than that the Kane no foul call went Norway way and I think it was correct by referee and VAR. The disallowed goal for the push by Haaland went England way and I think it was the coorect outcome by wrong process. It was a 'foul' but not enough for VAR to get involved.
Other than that the Kane no foul call went Norway way and I think it was correct by referee and VAR. The disallowed goal for the push by Haaland went England way and I think it was the coorect outcome by wrong process. It was a 'foul' but not enough for VAR to get involved.
This wording of it's a foul but it's not enough of a foul for VAR to get involved is something I can't get on board with because clearly FIFA has a lower threshold for VAR intervention, it is basically if the referee misses a foul and for me it was a clear foul then the VAR rightly gets involved as that is their instruction.
I think even in the PL that gets given as they want to tighten up on the holding and pushing stuff in the box for the upcoming season but I so can see them going with the "referees call" of backing the penalty just because there is contact.
We have to accept there is no "referees call" in this world cup, if its a wrong decision, it will get recommended to be overturned.
one
RefChat Addict
Fair point on my 'wording'. To be clear, for me it was not a clear and obvious error by the referee to 'ignore' that push. Happy to agree to disagree on our views on C&O.
And I actually believe FIFA has announced they want a higher threshold on VAR intervention for physical offences.
I think VAR cancelled itself out with the cancelled penalty and soft push. Both arguably not warranting of VAR intervention as not clear and obvious mistakes. I actually think both outcomes were correct in the end, but the VAR intervention, not so much.
Really sorry if this offends, but I simply can not see the wiregate impact on the ball - perhaps it is my England tinted glasses, but I’ve looked at all official replays, videos and slow motion replays and can not clearly see it.
I think what is definitely true is that Norway were great this competition and played some cracking football!
Playing football in that humidity last night clearly affected the quality of football - these things really need to be considered when choosing venues for hosting the competition in the future.
Really sorry if this offends, but I simply can not see the wiregate impact on the ball - perhaps it is my England tinted glasses, but I’ve looked at all official replays, videos and slow motion replays and can not clearly see it.
I think what is definitely true is that Norway were great this competition and played some cracking football!
Playing football in that humidity last night clearly affected the quality of football - these things really need to be considered when choosing venues for hosting the competition in the future.
I also see no conclusive evidence of ball touching cable. Wind gusts could have done similar at that height due to the design of the stadium.