Help keep RefChat running, any donation would be appreciated
Perfect is the enemy of good.Not finding fault with the process, I think the process is just fine. I have issue with the application of it. Based on people's feedback here, this is going to be very very inconsistent. Which would suggest they may as well not bother.
If you said this 10 years ago, I'd agree with you 100%. Nowadays they are attempting to make football perfect. That is basically why VAR was brought in.Perfect is the enemy of good.
It will never be perfect.
If only referees had a device that allowed them to accurately measure time. Especially the officials at the top of the pyramid. It's almost as though they don't have access to communicate with each other, so that one of them can count the referee down.......Being over zealous and extra strict with 8s carries a risk of counting to quick and penalising at 7. This i would find significantly less acceptable than what happens in this clip.
If you said this 10 years ago, I'd agree with you 100%. Nowadays they are attempting to make football perfect. That is basically why VAR was brought in.
In what way has it made it better? We have to sit for 5 minutes for someone to check whether someone's toenail was offside.Disagree. I think VAR was brought in to make it better, not perfect.
It has made it better, evidentially so. It can never be perfect because it involves humans and elements of subjectivity.
It's not hard to count to 8 and then blow the whistle.
A lot of excuses being made to keep the status quo.
I still most refs will be creative and ignore or make excuses.
If a goalkeeper "goes to ground" for pointless time why should the ref wait for them to get to their feet?
Collina's statement was VERY unhelpful.
He should "tow the line" in his position.
Sorry both but as a former keeper I think you've got this wrong. There are still defending and attacking players in his box for a few seconds after he has stood up and could prevent him releasing the ball. So entirely possible it's only 9 seconds before the referee blows from when you could reasonably expect the keeper to release the ball.If only referees had a device that allowed them to accurately measure time. Especially the officials at the top of the pyramid. It's almost as though they don't have access to communicate with each other, so that one of them can count the referee down.......
I played in goal myself, so I'm fully aware of how things work. The goalkeeper is up and has control. Yes, someone may challenge him. If they do, deal with that in the same way you would deal with any other challenge.Sorry both but as a former keeper I think you've got this wrong. There are still defending and attacking players in his box for a few seconds after he has stood up and could prevent him releasing the ball. So entirely possible it's only 9 seconds before the referee blows from when you could reasonably expect the keeper to release the ball.
But you wouldn't punish it if the keeper kicks it off a player making an effort to retreat, as all the defenders are, but they're still in the way for the first few seconds so he cannot release it.I played in goal myself, so I'm fully aware of how things work. The goalkeeper is up and has control. Yes, someone may challenge him. If they do, deal with that in the same way you would deal with any other challenge.
You can't not implement something, simply because of something that may or may not happen
Yes we use it in Beach soccer. Benefit it is gives a direct shot at goal...A similar 4 second law has been implemented in futsal (and i hear for beach soccer) strictly for years with no issues (with the exception of some lazy grassroots referees).
I can confidently say if we are going to apply it with flexibility, it will only take a few years to get back to where we are now.
I am not saying be overzealous. Just be as accurate as you can without deliberately counting slow or starting the count late.

If the goalkeeper kicks it off a player, that's his fault. I can have sympathy for such things at lower levels where the skill level isn't as high. But if a professional goalkeeper can't see a way around that situation, thats their problem.But you wouldn't punish it if the keeper kicks it off a player making an effort to retreat, as all the defenders are, but they're still in the way for the first few seconds so he cannot release it.
So he has to move around the players to release it, and therefore might take longer!If the goalkeeper kicks it off a player, that's his fault. I can have sympathy for such things at lower levels where the skill level isn't as high. But if a professional goalkeeper can't see a way around that situation, thats their problem.
VAR absolutely was NOT brought in to make football perfect, they were very clear to say that from day 1. It is to correct clear and obvious errors, if the intention was to make it perfect then it would obviously need to correct 100% of errors.If you said this 10 years ago, I'd agree with you 100%. Nowadays they are attempting to make football perfect. That is basically why VAR was brought in.
Don't forget in law it's 8 seconds from when the GK has control of the ball, not 8 seconds from when he can be expected to release the ball.Sorry both but as a former keeper I think you've got this wrong. There are still defending and attacking players in his box for a few seconds after he has stood up and could prevent him releasing the ball. So entirely possible it's only 9 seconds before the referee blows from when you could reasonably expect the keeper to release the ball.