Laws of the Game Quiz 2024-2025 #3 December. The final quiz of the year. With 1 clip, then 8 questions that were used in the 2024 big referee quiz on this blog. Good luck with the quiz! Laden…
Continue reading...
Continue reading...
Dutch Referee Blog - Laws of the Game Quiz 2024-2025 #3 December
Tingting
The Sheriff of the Wild West
Same here.
FirsFox40
RefChat Addict
Jan will fix it when he spots it, is a settings issue his side. Isn't some secret ref quiz answering club.
Still something not right about it… instead of the answers we get to see what percentage of people have answered what and it even shows everyone’s email address which isn’t good.
As for the questions, the only one I wasn’t really sure on was the one about the goalkeeper hanging on the crossbar. Can someone show me the relevant part of law? I’m struggling to find it.
And the last question doesn’t provide nearly enough information to correctly answer.
As for the questions, the only one I wasn’t really sure on was the one about the goalkeeper hanging on the crossbar. Can someone show me the relevant part of law? I’m struggling to find it.
And the last question doesn’t provide nearly enough information to correctly answer.
I would think the crossbar one comes under 'shows a lack of respect for the game/unsporting behaviour'.
There's nothing directly in law regarding the ACTUAL offence, as far as I can see.
santa sangria
RefChat Addict
Same. @jan will fix when he gets up
That question appears as a FAQ in the IFAB rules I think and no doubt a q&a about it somewhere.
Can't wait to sell that on a Sunday morning
Tingting
The Sheriff of the Wild West
Instead of that, it said it was a penalty.
one
RefChat Addict
This is contradictory to LOTG. What denied the opponest a goal was handling the ball (through 'illigal' means) There is only one case of handling that a goalkeeper can be sanctioned for and this is not it.
Hanging off the bar which is the 'illigal' act and is not handling is USB and only punishable by a yellow card.
one
RefChat Addict
A couple of comments on the quiz (which still has issues on submition for me).
KFTPM are now called penalty shoot out
And on Q8, though I have not seen the answer, my guess is the answer would be based on an offence has been committed.
Both acts of making one's body unnaturally bigger (e.g when shielding the ball), and stopping a promising attack can be done lotgfully. That is what the defenders are required to do. Unless something illigal like handling the ball happens, there is no offence.
KFTPM are now called penalty shoot out
And on Q8, though I have not seen the answer, my guess is the answer would be based on an offence has been committed.
Both acts of making one's body unnaturally bigger (e.g when shielding the ball), and stopping a promising attack can be done lotgfully. That is what the defenders are required to do. Unless something illigal like handling the ball happens, there is no offence.
one
RefChat Addict
The climbing offence is not what denied the goal, its the handling. Agree that it's inconsistent "if they didn't use their hand". This was the issue before they brought in the double touch DOGSO for keepers to make it consistent with "what if they dont use their hands". However similar offences have not been included. If the keeper releases the ball after control, and picked it up again because an attacker is about to tap it in, it would be similar to double touch but still no sanction.
IFAB need to bring more consistency into this.
one
RefChat Addict
Big assumption that there is a handling there when the question doesn't say there is
Agree that that is probably what he meant but shouldn't be left to an assumption to be made by the reader. As stated in the question, there is no offence and play on.
