Under what reason are you ruling it out?Anyone seen the subjective offside? Thoughts? I think correct but interested to see what others think.
Not a reasonTerrible decision, the keeper has no chance of making the save
Anyone seen the subjective offside? Thoughts? I think correct but interested to see what others think.
“Making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of the opponent to play the ball” - does being in the way of a keeper’s dive fall under that bit? I don’t think the keeper should have to dive into the player to get the decision.Under what reason are you ruling it out?
making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ballI'm stuck on this one...
On one hand
He is not blocking line of vision, he is not challenging, he does not attempt to play the ball, nor does he make an obvious action,
Yet somehow, Offside still feels right, I just can't match the law to the decision.
What was the obvious action though?“Making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of the opponent to play the ball” - does being in the way of a keeper’s dive fall under that bit? I don’t think the keeper should have to dive into the player to get the decision.
I admit I don’t know - but if we don’t interpret it like that, implication is that a player can stand next to the keeper on the goalline and not be interfering even if the keeper dives right into him!What was the obvious action though?
I think the keeper is impacted because the player is stood in the way of a potential dive.Under what reason are you ruling it out?
Winner. Offside.View attachment 7363
He does the top bullet point for me.
Nothing in the laws that says about the keeper being able to save the ball or not.