callmemyref
Well-Known Member
what do you do when the player preventing the goalie from realising the ball? some referees just ignore
And do you give a card after a few times?A common mistake when the keeper has the ball in hand is to turn away and run up field. You should run backward. If there are opponents deliberately getting in the way of keeper's release I usually yell "move away". If it continues and keeper unable to release or even keeper later releases but the opponent has a notable negative impact, it's IFK. If I don't give a free kick because there was no impact, it's a quite talk to the opponent on the rA''
For me it's what we mean by 'notable negative impact'. If it's a deliberate attempt to block the ball (before I have a chance to shout) I might even caution the first (unsporting behaviour). If it's hanging around and trying to influence, then I would be having a word to warn of the potential offence before it happens. If it's then done again, it's an easy sell for a caution.And do you give a card after a few times?
Yes, majority of release interference are gonna be SPA and a caution for that reasonNeed to think about SPA too, in case of the opportunity to play a quick ball out
Yes, majority of release interference are gonna be SPA and a caution for that reason
Ironically, I had a bit of a 'dressing room disagreement' with a 'shoe-in 5-to-4 candidate' recently. He was quite 'upset' about my insistence that interfering with the release is not a caution in itself. Can't teach these CORE kids anything these days!
Need to think about SPA too, in case of the opportunity to play a quick ball out
Which is not necessarily a caution (assuming you mean PIADM)You can also get them for dangerous play really, depending on the manner of interference.
Hmmmm . It's one of those where if you decide the interference is serious enough to stop the play for a free kick, then you'd better be seen to AT LEAST have a very strong word with the offender. Otherwise you've disadvantaged the team trying to release the ball for very little positive purpose.Yes, majority of release interference are gonna be SPA and a caution for that reason
Ironically, I had a bit of a 'dressing room disagreement' with a 'shoe-in 5-to-4 candidate' recently. He was quite 'upset' about my insistence that interfering with the release is not a caution in itself. Can't teach these CORE kids anything these days!
The occasion on which I stopped the game recently, the GK was arguably as much at fault as the interferer. However, I'm such a 'safe referee' and a member of the 'Goalkeeper's Union', that the whistle blew without my 'conscious commanding' it to do so. I then almost proceeded to drop the ball to the Keeper, but luckily, I don't make errors in Law and an IDFK ensued!Hmmmm . It's one of those where if you decide the interference is serious enough to stop the play for a free kick, then you'd better be seen to AT LEAST have a very strong word with the offender. Otherwise you've disadvantaged the team trying to release the ball for very little positive purpose.
OK, you don't really need to see it(geo blocked for me). No he wasn't. This was in the 40th. He got his only caution in the 74th.
Right decision. It may have ended up a promising attack but the odds were against it. At the time of the offence it was not a promising attack so the offence did not stop a.....