There are numerous precedents over recent weeks in which, without question, penalty kick offences have not penalised
These incidents would be classed as subjective (although some have been certain), for which the protocol says an OFR 'is often appropriate'
Don't get me wrong, I loathe the OFR so am happy to see it dispensed with. My point however, is that it is a mockery that the OFR is not being used. More importantly, (specifically) clear & obvious errors are either, a. not being reviewed, or b. the bar is so high, that it doesn't seem to exist
How much non-compliance is needed to substantiate my claim?
Latterly, the ROTW were reviewing incidents and overturning decisions which fell miles short of the criteria specified