Agree and disagree. While that was part of the reason it wasn't all of it. Can I say I think you are under-reading it?
The complete phrase: "is guilty of dissent, using offensive, insulting or abusive language and/or gestures or other verbal offences"
There would be no reason to add "or other verbal offence" if the reason you stated was the only one. So for me you (now) stop play because there was an IFK offence which is also a cautionable one.
As an analogy, if there is a reckless trip, the reason to stop play is not the USB, it's the trip offence which in this instance is also a cautionable one.