I remember you said similar about Clement Turpin after the opening game of Euro 2024 yet he still went on to do another group stage game and a knock out game. I appreciate that was UEFA and this is FIFA though.
When he went sprinting over to the Mexican player after the blatant act of dissent I felt the caution was inevitably going to follow. To not give one doesn’t look great IMO.
Other than that, he’s been fine so far but it looks like it has the potential to be a difficult 90+ minutes.
On one replay it looked like a DR Congo foul and on another it looked an England foul. Maybe shouldn’t have been an advantage, but playing on seemed a fair decision.
I thought the potential DOGSO was the strongest shout of the three. All evening the referee had a very high bar for a foul so to be fair to him, not giving a foul for the McGinn and McTominay challenges was very consistent with the rest of the game. I think both are fouls, but they don’t feel...
Just woken up and seen this. Weirdly, despite the fact they did end up getting to the right decision in the end, that’s the wrong decision for me as it sets a dangerous precedent where they’ve effectively reviewed a standard yellow card.
That’s exactly what Steven McLean does in the next clip when he was asked to review a potential penalty for Hearts, coincidentally in exactly the same position at Fir Park. He felt the footage of the contact on the Hearts attacker was inconclusive, so stuck to his initial decision of play on...
I did many games as an AR for a ref (now Category 1 ref in Scotland) who always said pre-match that if there was a penalty awarded, hold your position for a few seconds before coming in to the goal line position, as if a player came charging across to the corner flag, then it makes it a whole...
Am I correct in saying that, for example, if the player took their shirt off in celebration of the (soon to be disallowed) goal, then the caution would still stand? i.e. any disciplinary action still stands, even if the decision doesn’t.
Glad you mentioned that as I’d forgotten about that until now. It did look like he pointed for a corner and then changed his mind - presumably after comms with one of the ARs. Correct decision even if it looked slightly messy.
That’s one of the best statements I’ve seen from the SFA in a long time. I get the impression from it that this has been building up for a while and (rightly) Wednesday night was the straw that broke the camel’s back. For example, Michael Stewart was banned by the SFA from Hampden for April’s...
I think this has highlighted an interesting contradiction in the wording of the handball law - although who is surprised by that 😜
It states that it’s a handball offence if a player handles the ball when their hand has made their body unnaturally bigger. However it then goes on to define...
I was going to post a separate thread but it links in with this so I’ll put it here instead. Hibs equaliser was allowed to stand as the VAR didn’t believe there was conclusive evidence of a handball.
If a player tries to push an opponent out of the way how much force is necessary? I’d say none, yet nobody would be expecting a red card if it was player on player. I think the threshold for what’s “acceptable” for pushing match officials should be lower than players, but the LOTG don’t...
It’s not a challenge for the ball (obviously) so careless, reckless etc doesn’t come into it for me. Therefore you’re left to decide whether or not it’s violent conduct. VC does mention excessive force or brutality, but this doesn’t come anywhere near that in my opinion. Caution for lack of...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.