DavidObs's latest activity
-
DDavidObs replied to the thread Luton v Swindon Sub error.At least Drinian didn’t score!
-
DThe other way round Tafazolli 17 was on the team sheet, Drinian 23 comes on. It’s difficult to understand how the 4O messed up, if the...
-
DDavidObs replied to the thread Luton v Swindon Sub error.It will be interesting to see what comes out in the wash, which I would expect to be fairly quick, because what we don’t want again at...
-
DDavidObs replied to the thread Luton v Swindon Sub error.Good point & if there was an avoidable error from the 4th official/AR, then another reason why Swindon should not be thrown out of the...
-
DDavidObs replied to the thread Newcastle v Man City.I still don’t agree about VAR being generally worse, though agree that there have been occasions of approx 5 min plus with offside...
-
DDavidObs replied to the thread Luton v Swindon Sub error.Seems clear to me that the issue lies squarely at the foot of the club. It’s their responsibility to ensure the team submitted to the...
-
DDavidObs replied to the thread Newcastle v Man City.Not sure I agree with that - getting worse. At Bournemouth last year with SAOT it took over 9 mins and yesterday nearly 6 - so virtually...
-
DAgreed and for them to get rid of this 5cm tolerance line also and accept offside is offside even if it's just by a nose. The fact the...
-
DDavidObs replied to the thread Newcastle v Man City.Despite all the justified hoo ha from last night, I think the best that can be expected is that semi automatic offsides is taken off...
-
DDavidObs replied to the thread Newcastle v Man City.Agreed, but I don’t think those who are critical of VAR should be pointing the finger at Attwell as many are on social media. The semi...
-
DBefore you go down the conspiracy theory route, if you look at the lines they showed the defensive one was thicker than the attacking...
-
DThe commentators didn't help, they kept saying that VAR were checking for Haaland interfering with Pope. If he was offside (see below)...
-
DDavidObs replied to the thread VAR errors up 30%.Even the KMI panel is subjective and not God. It cannot and should not be seen as a definitive yes the Referee was wrong etc. A...
-
DCorrect, it is in the article. They vote on the on-field decision and then again on the VAR decision. As an example, for the Chelsea...
-
DDavidObs replied to the thread West Ham's Earring.Yes that’s true, but I would relate it to someone leaving a bag on the back seat of the car when parked up - don’t give anyone an...
