Help keep RefChat running, any donation would be appreciated
The unfortunate reality is that if the events were subjective decisions (rather than obvious mistakes) VAR is unlikely / not meant to step in and "solve" the differing on-field decisions in any case ......The people: We hate VAR
Also the people: Why can't we have consistency on these 2 similar events where the on field decision was different.
This is what I mean. The entire difference on both of these is the on field decision and it not being obviously wrong enough for VAR to get involved, but those that bemoan VAR would be no better off without it, as the end result would be exactly as it was.The unfortunate reality is that if the events were subjective decisions (rather than obvious mistakes) VAR is unlikely / not meant to step in and "solve" the differing on-field decisions in any case ......
That just means perpetuating inconsistencies, and there are still inconsistencies in what VAR (really VARs) consider clear and obvious.This is what I mean. The entire difference on both of these is the on field decision and it not being obviously wrong enough for VAR to get involved, but those that bemoan VAR would be no better off without it, as the end result would be exactly as it was.
So, does saying "End of" mean VAR won't bother with a review?
Hello @FA_PGMOL I’d like an explanation as to the difference in these two challenges? Thanks.
He said "the on-field decision is a foul..." right? So taking in full context "end of" refers to the on-field decision.So, does saying "End of" mean VAR won't bother with a review?
"End of" is "end of discussion". Would that be a useful addition to the VAR protocol as code for "Don't bother recommending a review"?He said "the on-field decision is a foul..." right? So taking in full context "end of" refers to the on-field decision
I think you're adding 2 and 2 together and coming up with 57,641. End of discussion with the players, no?"End of" is "end of discussion". Would that be a useful addition to the VAR protocol as code for "Don't bother recommending a review"?
I see.I think you're adding 2 and 2 together and coming up with 57,641. End of discussion with the players, no?
You've taken it wrong again, it was very clear he was talking to a player when he said end of.I see.
I had taken it as part of the dialogue with VAR...
Well, you've taken that wrong. I was admitting that's wasn't how I'd taken it. Which means it wasn't clear....You've taken it wrong again, it was very clear he was talking to a player when he said end of.
You seem to have overlooked an obvious cut in the footage between those two statements. The 'end of' is clearly addressed to the player.Well, you've taken that wrong. I was admitting that's wasn't how I'd taken it. Which means it wasn't clear....
Is that what referees with VAR say to players? "The on-field decision is...."
So "the onfield decision is a foul" is addressed not to the player in front of him but to VAR, and (cut) "it's a clear foul, end of" to the players?You seem to have overlooked an obvious cut in the footage between those two statements. The 'end of' is clearly addressed to the player.