Ha!
As I think I've said, I am ready to give it up completely. I accept that "my team" might be a "victim" of a Thierry Henry handball. And it's not because "that's football". Absolutely not. We, the football family, and as officials, should always be advancing how we officiate the game. But VAR in anything like its current form is not the answer.
GLT yes. 100% benefit for virtually zero risk and zero interruption. GLT is fantastic. It is the polar opposite of VAR.
VAR no. Marginal benefit, massive inequality, massive disruption. VAR is poor.
This is going back a bit... what I think football needs is retrospective punishment for cheating, missed cards, missed VC, verbal abuse.
One big "plus" about VAR is the column inches, the news coverage. I think re-refereeing the game 24 hours later and punishing (from a palette of offences) cheating and things missed by officials, could be fantastic for the game, humanise referees and get great coverage. It wouldn't change the result on the field but it could clean up the game and could promote positive change down the pyramid. That's my vision. Ditch VAR and introduce match reviews.