zarathustra
RefChat Addict
I am not sure why some ppl are arguing under current law this goal should be disallowed. This goal should have stood because it did not create a goal scoring opportunity. It created a build up which lead to a goal scoring opportunity and then a goal.
Yes the law could have been clearer but even under the current law this goal should have stood.
Next year's law has been changed so the intent is clearer by adding the word immediately. That is "touched their or a team-mate’s hand/arm... Immediately creates a goal-scoring opportunity"
Are you talking about the same incident?
The ball hits his hand, falls to Kane who takes 3-4 touches and scores, seems like a goal scoring opportunity to me.
It's about 4 seconds between the ball hitting his hand and Kane scoring.
Last edited: