Well thought out honest answers
Thank you.
Well thought out honest answers
Second clip, originally thought no pen, foot isn't high, head isn't low, intention was to clear the ball.
On replay, I'd be playing on.
I see what you're saying but intention isn't something we should be taking into account, it's no longer a consideration in the LOTG for us
Fair enough, but isn't intention covered regarding say a tackle from the back or side, if going for the ball in the penalty area as a player is attacking?
This is the sort of thing I'm getting at /thinking of, obviously law 12.
Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offender is cautioned if the offence was an attempt to play the ball; in all other circumstances (e.g. holding, pulling, pushing, no possibility to play the ball etc.) the offending player must be sent off.
Yes, but this isn’t a DOGSO incident. Note intention is used to establish the extent of DOGSO, not whether something is a foul or not
I'll have to try and change my way of thinking /seeing things then...
Not necessarily saying you’re wrong and I think we all - whether consciously or subconsciously - consider a player’s intention. The point, however, is that this is no longer in the LOTG - just something to consider