Saw something yesterday that made me question a referees decision... What would you have done?
I also have another scenario for you...
Reds vs Blues...
Reds mount an attack and manage to get a shot away and it IS on target. Blue keeper is beaten but a defender has managed to get back on his line, instead of swinging a leg at the ball (which he may of saved), he sticks out a hand and palms the ball into the net. What's your decision?
Second scenario:
Same as before but the attackers shot is not on target, the defender dives for the ball and palms that into the goal... What's your decision?
I also have another scenario for you...
Reds vs Blues...
Reds mount an attack and manage to get a shot away and it IS on target. Blue keeper is beaten but a defender has managed to get back on his line, instead of swinging a leg at the ball (which he may of saved), he sticks out a hand and palms the ball into the net. What's your decision?
Second scenario:
Same as before but the attackers shot is not on target, the defender dives for the ball and palms that into the goal... What's your decision?