No it doesn't.Intention does have a role in this. That is the whole point of the double jeopardy rule?!
Not watching the game, but I can picture what happened from the image. Probably entirely accidentalThe whole point of the red card in this situation is if the defender has done something on purpose to deny the goal.... i.e a rugby tackle/hacked down/handball/shirt pull....
Being kicked is none of the above.
No it isn't. You have misunderstood the change.The whole point of the red card in this situation is if the defender has done something on purpose to deny the goal.... i.e a rugby tackle/hacked down/handball/shirt pull....
Being kicked is none of the above.
The whole point of the red card in this situation is if the defender has done something on purpose to deny the goal.... i.e a rugby tackle/hacked down/handball/shirt pull....
Being kicked is none of the above.
I can understand where he's coming from however. Often these incidents are entirely accidentalThat's a noble opinion, but that's not how the laws are written.
that is why it would be a yellow and a penalty.I can understand where he's coming from however. Often these incidents are entirely accidental
On the other hand, why should the attacker be denied an opportunity IF the attacker is not at fault?
I can understand where he's coming from however. Often these incidents are entirely accidental
On the other hand, why should the attacker be denied an opportunity IF the attacker is not at fault?
As a ref, expect backlash regardless of the decision
'No attempt to play the ball' means there's no yellow card 'get out'. It's just another hole in the LOTG which needs plugging IMOthat is why it would be a yellow and a penalty.
It's not. It falls under no possibility to play the ball. Its a red card under the current laws. As unfair as it might feel, its a correct decision.that is why it would be a yellow and a penalty.
Fair enough, in a match on a Saturday, I wouldn't have previously been sending the bloke off haha - at least I know I should now.'No attempt to play the ball' means there's no yellow card 'get out'. It's just another hole in the LOTG which needs plugging IMO
I've seen it on the highlights. I don't think it was careless by Luiz, I think it was entirely accidental. Therefore, no foul, no DOGSOFair enough, in a match on a Saturday, I wouldn't have previously been sending the bloke off haha - at least I know I should now.
I've seen it on the highlights. I don't think it was careless by Luiz, I think it was entirely accidental. Therefore, no foul, no DOGSO
That said, referees have united to class all of these as 'careless', so I'd be in a minority (not a place any ref wants to be)
Like I say, the attacker deserves their OGSO, so the ref is gonna get it in the neck regardless of the decision