It tells you underneath if you click on it.Who voted yes, come on?
It tells you underneath if you click on it.Who voted yes, come on?
Correct... But the contact is driven by the movement of the attacker in this one I feel. Then we end up in a situation where attackers just end up in the way of being kicked and the game becomes a farce.The right to kick the ball does not nullify or supersede the responsibility for safety or duty of care.
For any further reasoning see discussions in the thread I posted of a send off for a similar incident in EPL.
Disagree. It's like saying a player headbutting another player's fist with his face if he is moving towards a punch.Correct... But the contact is driven by the movement of the attacker in this one I feel. Then we end up in a situation where attackers just end up in the way of being kicked and the game becomes a farce.
Simply by broadcasting that conversation (as per both rugby codes), then the participants minds will be focussed on getting the correct rational decision, they won't be just communicating within their own little bubble, and that in itself will result in better decisions being made. The bonus being that everyone else will then know 'why' that decision has been made.Yes, definitely need that
My ideal var process is much more like that in rugby league or field hockey (appreciate they're both very different but they show that player and referee referrals work well) where the ref but know it's not very likely to happen