Correct. No advantage because, as has been discussed many times before, there is no penal offence against the opponent, just a technical offence, e.g. no advantage from an offside.IDFK. Goal kick taker plays the ball a second time, offence occurs before the ball enters the goal. Simples
It doesn't but LOTG stateThat quote doesn't mention anything about the offence having to occur against the non-offending team..
Did an offence occur? Yes
Did the non-offending team benefit? Yes
It was a discussion about an offside offence being signalled by an AR and the referee signalling advantage when the GK collected the ball into his arms. It became tedious over the penal vs technical offence thingAdvantage can only be applied when an offence is committed againgst another player/team
No offence was committed againgst anyone, human, player
The offence committed breached the LOTG, inhumane, inanimate, whatever you wish to call them, Advantage is not applicable is such cases
Sorry if its been a topic before
Send DE another one with this scenario and get his interpretation of the law"
Thank you for your e mail.
'Advantage' is where the referee allows play to continue when a player has committed an offence and by not penalising this offence there is a 'benefit' to the non-offending team.
It is very clear that this applies to Law 11 - Offside and thus in the circumstances you outline this is clearly application of the advantage as outlined in Law 5.
Best wishes
David Elleray
Technical Director
The International Football Association Board - IFAB
"
Joe Hart - ball was not in play when the second touch occurred so not a great exampleJoe Hart goal kick v QPR? Correctly retaken.
This is not correct though according to the LotG and the IFAB though, right?lets make it simple. Free kick taken by centre half 25 yards from own goal, he miskicks it and centre forward is rushing in, defender realises this so takes a second touch but it falls to striker who belts ball in from 25 yards. You cant play advantage here because as soon as defender takes second touch the LOTG have been infringed.
Joe Hart goal kick v QPR? Correctly retaken.
In short, by breaking a requirement of the law, advantage is null and void.
When a team or player have been infringed, advantage is good to go
I don't mean this to be as confrontational as it sounds but its seems to as though you're just making this up (which I know you can't be because Brian agrees so it must have been written/discussed somewhere).lets make it simple. Free kick taken by centre half 25 yards from own goal, he miskicks it and centre forward is rushing in, defender realises this so takes a second touch but it falls to striker who belts ball in from 25 yards. You cant play advantage here because as soon as defender takes second touch the LOTG have been infringed.
Joe Hart goal kick v QPR? Correctly retaken.
In short, by breaking a requirement of the law, advantage is null and void.
When a team or player have been infringed, advantage is good to go