Took a while!!! Thoughts!!!!
...the referee has the option to:
• make a decision based only on the information received from the VAR or
• review the footage directly before making a final decision (on-field review – OFR)
OFRs will be mainly for ‘subjective’ decisions or to assist match control or to ‘sell’ a decision. An OFR should not be needed for factual decisions such as the position of an offence or player (e.g. offside), point of contact on the body for handball or a foul etc.
[...]
For red card offences (except DOGSO), only the incident is reviewed. For goals, penalty incidents and DOGSO offences, the referee can review the play as far back as the start of the attacking move which led to the incident ...
[...]
Whilst the review process should be completed as efficiently/quickly as possible, accuracy is more important than speed.
Interesting. Now, in mid 2017, that OFR probably helped match control. If there is VAR at every prem game next season, I suggest that OFR will not aid match control in a year's time.Here's what the IFAB's VAR protocol document says about this (in part):
Apparently there will be a "video area"; players who enter get booked and other people who enter get sent off. Not sure how effective this will be though...One observation I have is with regard to where the VAR is positioned. We tend never to see VARs in other sports so I assumed this would be similar in football. Perhaps this is just venue and tournament specific but the pitch side location has the risk of everyone coming across to give an opinion. Any debate between the officials also risks the accusation that the can't decide. Thoughts?