Two Footed

[JH]

https://streamable.com/z1082

What we thinking?

 

[WilliamD]

Not even convinced it was a foul in slow mo. Player in control enough to get the ball straight on and none of the player.

 

[Russell Jones]

Yellow for the number 8 for the shirt pull, yellow for the number 2 for the tackle, the latter aved from a red by the relative control in the challenge and the fact that he so clearly played the ball

 

[Sheffields Finest]

Two footed?? Look closer!!! It's one at best!!!

 

[one]

And you were saying?

 

[one]

I'd just warn 8 for shirt pull but yellow for the reckless tackle.

 

[spuddy1878]

Thats surely excessive force !

 

[Sheffields Finest]

I'd just warn 8 for shirt pull but yellow for the reckless tackle.

You lot should stick to cricket, this video editing lark (VAR) is far too intuitive for you boys!!!

 

[RustyRef]

If the referee sees that properly I think he walks. Both feet are clearly off the floor, there's a jumping motion, straight leg challenge, and he can't possibly be fully in control of it.

 

[CapnBloodbeard]

Not even convinced it was a foul in slow mo. Player in control enough to get the ball straight on and none of the player.

You absolutely cannot become airborne and jump at the ball that's at a player's foot.

I'm not really convinced it was 2 footed...in the sense that his feet weren't together, and he's fortunate that he sort of hit the ground as he hit the ball. But still reckless for me. I wouldn't bother with the yellow for the whist pull, at this point maybe just a warning, though it wouldn't be unjustified.