Can, an observation report, be disputed?
Does a fabricated caution count?
And when I eventually caution said player, I got marked down as not showing the red.
Also an alleged dogso, 1 on 1 attacker on keeper with 2 other defender in vicinity?
Biggest problems with observations for referees is surprises. Developments should be written on a carbon copy form and given to the referee at the end of debrief if they aren’t on that form then it shouldn’t be used in the report.
Fabricated caution: he wrote on report I caution a player, when in fact I called him in, gave a talking to, but no yellow card shown.
On the dogso, I was 7-8 yards behind play, unobstructed view. Observer some 60 yards behind me almost in line with the D on opposite end, sat down on the opposite side
I agree about the no surprises and nothing major should be in the report that isn't in the debrief.
But I have never heard of an observer using a carbon copy form. Personally I have a debrief form that I go through after with the officials, if there's a significant piece of development advice and I don't mention it in the debrief it doesn't go in the report.
Easy change to make and would probably help observers.
The observer coordinator always says that if it’s not in the debrief then it doesn’t go in the report.
However whensomething comes up that wasn’t in the debrief it’s ‘have to go with the written report’ and there’s no recourse.
Most observers are very good but there’s on or two where you are tempted to record it!
So the incorrect caution possibly counts as being incorrect in law.
For the DOGSO it doesn't matter where you and the observer were, and realistically the observer will always be further away than you. Really nothing you can do here, if he says it should have been DOGSO then he is correct as far as the observation is concerned.
So, in short, there goes my chance of promotion!
If you bang the next two as above average and overall you have a good reputation with the league and county FA (admin; admin and again admin) then you are good to go. Back when I was doing it, 2 out of 3 was the norm.Level 7-6. The report been marked below average.
snapApart from that is resorting to more paper in a world that is becoming increasingly paper free. Also observers wouldn't have time to do it - for a supply league game I wait ten minutes before going in and that ten minutes is fully filled with scribbling down my notes as to what I am going to cover. If I had to make it understandable to the officials it would take at least double that.
This can be attributed to a poorly structured de-brief. At Supply and above Observers are encouraged to check disciplinary actions, cover key match incidents, talk about areas of strength and development. If your observer had done the same, there would have been no misunderstandingDoes a fabricated caution count?
And when I eventually caution said player, I got marked down as not showing the red.
Also an alleged dogso, 1 on 1 attacker on keeper with 2 other defender in vicinity?
This can be attributed to a poorly structured de-brief. At Supply and above Observers are encouraged to check disciplinary actions, cover key match incidents, talk about areas of strength and development. If your observer had done the same, there would have been no misunderstanding