The Ref Stop

Offside Question (Yes the famous offside rules)

DaveTheRef

New Member
Hi all,

Quick one, for those who watched Arsenal vs Southampton yesterday. If Martinelli passed the ball backwards to Kai Havertz (instead of going for goal), would Havertz have been flagged offside? Given he was offside when the ball was played in.

Many thanks
 
The Ref Stop
Haven’t seen the incident, but it doesn’t matter which direction the ball is played in. You can be offside if the ball goes forwards, backwards, sideward or diagonal.

The confusion comes from the fact a player cannot be offside if they are behind the ball when it is played.
 
Haven’t seen the incident, but it doesn’t matter which direction the ball is played in. You can be offside if the ball goes forwards, backwards, sideward or diagonal.

The confusion comes from the fact a player cannot be offside if they are behind the ball when it is played.
Cheers for the reply. Please have a look at the incident when you have a minute. When the ball is played in, Havertz is offside, if Martinelli passes to him for a tap in, is Havertz still technically offside or is that considered a "second phase of play"?
 
Cheers for the reply. Please have a look at the incident when you have a minute. When the ball is played in, Havertz is offside, if Martinelli passes to him for a tap in, is Havertz still technically offside or is that considered a "second phase of play"?
Also have not seen the clip.

Offside is judged at the moment the ball is last played/touched by a team mate and each time this happens. So provided that the following is true the no offside occurs:
1. Havertz in offside position
2. Ball played to Martinelli
3. Havertz neither interferes with play or an opponent (see law 11 to understand what this means)
4. Havertz moves into an on side position
5. Martinelli plays/touches the ball

Then no offside offence would have occurred.
 
Cheers for the reply. Please have a look at the incident when you have a minute. When the ball is played in, Havertz is offside, if Martinelli passes to him for a tap in, is Havertz still technically offside or is that considered a "second phase of play"?
I haven't seen, or can't remember, it but offside would only be judged at the time Martinelli passes to him, where he was stood for a previous cross becomes irrelevant.
 
I haven't seen, or can't remember, it but offside would only be judged at the time Martinelli passes to him, where he was stood for a previous cross becomes irrelevant.
Unless he commits an offence before this, but it doesn't sound like he does from the written explanation
 
He would have been onside as he’s behind the ball. Doesn’t matter where he was when the original ball came in. Martinellis touch basically resets that
IMG_0768.jpeg
 
Back
Top