A&H

Bournemouth v Brentford

L

ladbroke8745

RefChat Addict
Referee called to monitor to review his onfield penalty, which I feel was a weak review.
Personally, in real time, I don't think it was a foul but I don't see how it was clear and obvious to warrant a review.

Also...

How can Solanke not get cautioned for this....
He scores a goal and puts on a mask.
In the laws of the game it is punishable with a caution.... Even if the goal is ruled out.
Plus, the mask is hideous. Thats worthy of a caution regardless.
Screenshot_20240511-164429~2.png20240511_164642.jpg
 
The Referee Store
ladbroke8745 said:
Referee called to monitor to review his onfield penalty, which I feel was a weak review.
Personally, in real time, I don't think it was a foul but I don't see how it was clear and obvious to warrant a review.
Click to expand...
I personally can't see why he was sent to the monitor. Looked a clear careless challenge (and therefore penalty) to me.
 
Kes said:
I personally can't see why he was sent to the monitor. Looked a clear careless challenge (and therefore penalty) to me.
Click to expand...
Can barely see a challenge from the defender tbh, let alone a careless one. Toney looks for and instigates contact for me
 
I'm very surprised that this thread is the only mention I've seen anywhere of the fact that Solanke twice committed an offence which is an mandatory caution and escaped scot-free both times. At best poor alertness/awareness if the officials didn't spot it, at worst dereliction of duty if they did spot it and failed to ensure the appropriate sanction was given.
 
es1 said:
Can barely see a challenge from the defender tbh, let alone a careless one. Toney looks for and instigates contact for me
Click to expand...
So the defender doesn't just barge into him from behind then? 🤔
 
Not an action worthy of a foul for me. The 'barge' isn't strong enough to knock my toddler over. Huge exaggeration of minimal contact.
 
Kes said:

58 seconds in. If that's not careless I don't know what is ...
Click to expand...
FA don't want them given
It was the theme of the most recent Level 3/4 Training Evening. I don't think it's a foul anyway. I have a high bar for upper body challenges and I think Toney is looking for it and 'gambling' on the Ref being as soft as ye
 
Big Cat said:
FA don't want them given
It was the theme of the most recent Level 3/4 Training Evening. I don't think it's a foul anyway. I have a high bar for upper body challenges and I think Toney is looking for it and 'gambling' on the Ref being as soft as ye
Click to expand...
I know all about the minor contact direction given to referees but PGMOL isn't the same (when was it ever? :rolleyes:).
It's still a careless challenge.
 
I don't particularly think it's a foul. But I'm not convinced it's a C&O error. Especially after what we've seen recently from VAR input or therelackof
 
Just watched the clip, foot on the ball, for me he doesn't commit an offence on the player, I'd be shouting "touch not a foul, bit of pressure".

Looking for it for me.
 
Kes said:
I know all about the minor contact direction given to referees but PGMOL isn't the same (when was it ever? :rolleyes:).
It's still a careless challenge.
Click to expand...
The 'minor contact direction' given to PGMOL officials is exactly the same as to other referees. NFC (Normal Football Contact) is most definitely 'a thing' :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top