Do not use the stepped approach for dissent. Dissent = caution. Stepped approach is for persistent infringement, i.e. repeat low level penal offences by the same player
Do not use the stepped approach for dissent. Dissent = caution. Stepped approach is for persistent infringement, i.e. repeat low level penal offences by the same player
Sounds like you were nervous for nothing then?Well 1st assessment done. I think it went well, he said it was an absolute pleasure to watch, he was really impressed with my match control and application of law, communication was spot on, if I lost weight (I'm a fat git) and got fitter then I'll have a really bright future. Which was really good to hear (as a very over weight 37 year old!!).
There were a few developmentals, I didn't brief a replacement AR, over use of play on, I forgot to indicate indirect for an offside, so nothing major I don't think.
I'll see what the report says next week!!
Dissent is any protest which exceeds the referee's tolerance level and/or is obvious that it is a protest. So loud shouts from a distance need to be dealt with. The most obvious dissent of this type is the waving around of arms, usually accompanied by a verbal protest. If something is said from a few feet away and is unheard by anyone more than say 10 feet away, then this type of situation can be managed. If however the arms are being waved around, then the referee needs to take action. If it is very obvious, the only course of action is to caution.Brian, at what point would you, as an assessor, say that dissent becomes dissent. It's one of those many things in football where varying levels of tolerance amongst referees lead to varying responses to 'dissent'. Are assessors given guidelines on what constitutes dissent or, as with referees, do tolerance levels and responses vary.